![]() ![]() If you are unfamiliar with angular size, picture this. ![]() again, the closest distance from earth), the planets – with the exception of Jupiter – will not be larger than 30 arcseconds in angular size. the closest distance from earth) or the inner planets are at their closest western or eastern elongation (i.e. Even at the best of times, when the outer planets are ‘in opposition’ (i.e. The most important thing is that a planetary telescope has a sufficient focal length. Five important criteria (must-haves) to look for in a planetary telescope Focal length at least 2000mm (high magnification) ![]() I’ll first start with the five must-haves, after which I’ll mention five nice-to-haves. Also, if you have any thoughts or experiences with the telescopes that I’m going to mention, I highly encourage you to leave a message in the comments section so that others who read this blog can benefit from your experience as well. My priorities may be different than yours so I would always encourage you to do your own research. It is important to state at this point that I’m an amateur astrophotographer myself, performing my astrophotography in Utrecht, The Netherlands. Also, I considered a number of nice-to-haves that I would personally prefer to see in a planetary scope. PART 1: WHAT IS A GOOD TELESCOPE FOR PLANETARY IMAGING?īased on my own research, I came to the conclusion that five criteria are especially important for a good planetary telescope. Next, I’ll compare five telescopes to each of the criteria I’ve mentioned in the first part. In this blog, I’ll first explain some must-haves and nice-to-haves that I would deem important for a planetary telescope. A big advantage of the C8 is that it is the shortest (425mm) and lightest (5,8 kg) telescope in this overview, with a decent aperture (203mm) and focal length (2036mm). The Celestron XLT C8 Schmidt Cassegrain finished third. This telescope has the longest focal length in this price range as a Maksutov telescope which gives you a high magnification needed for planetary imaging, it has a small secondary mirror, and users report that the telescope requires almost no maintenance. A decent second was the SkyWatcher Skymax Pro 180mm. It has a decent 8″ aperture, a long focal length of 2436mm, it doesn’t have a corrector plate that would attract dew and require a longer cooldown time, and it comes with a 1/10th fine focuser. The outcome is that the Classical Cassegrain 203/2436mm (F/12) ticked most of the criteria I was looking for. I’ve compared five planetary telescopes from $500 to $1250 on a number of criteria. Are you looking for a reasonably affordable telescope for planetary imaging? I had the same question and decided to do some research. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |